Summary
- Jackson’s LOTR movies left out key plot points to fit cinematic constraints, altering characters and storylines for better or worse.
- Some changes, like cutting Tom Bombadil, streamlined the narrative, while others like Erkenbrand’s omission affected the depth of the story.
- The adaptation’s success depended on bold commercial choices to bring Tolkien’s expansive world to the big screen.
Peter Jackson’s critically acclaimed The Lord of the Rings movies adapted J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings novel, but they weren’t always faithful to the source material. Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies left out a lot of Tolkien’s content. The movies’ theatrical editions all have long runtimes compared to other releases as it is, and Jackson likely couldn’t have crammed in much more. The movies necessitated substantial change to the source material due to the inherent challenge of adapting books to cinema, and in particular, adapting Tolkien’s vast, sprawling narrative into commercially viable movies.
Even bearing this in mind, some of the changes Jackson made to Tolkien’s characters were questionable. However, extended editions of The Lord of the Rings movies were released which added back some of the story that seemed like it was missing from the theatrical editions. As unbelievable as it now seems, many hadn’t heard of Lord of the Rings before Jackson’s movies, and Jackson’s team had to secure vast sums of money to manifest its vision, so the project was a huge risk for many. Jackson’s difficult, bold, commercial choices ultimately allowed for the existence of these flawed but fantastic movies.
Related The Lord Of The Rings’ 9 Fellowship Members Ranked By Power
The nine members of the Fellowship of the Ring from The Lord of the Rings make a formidable team, but how do they rank individually based on power?
4
15 Frodo Left Bag End Ages After Bilbo’s Party In The Book
The Fellowship of The Ring Compressed The Book’s Timeline
Close
The book introduced the Shire and its residents at a far more leisurely pace than Peter Jackson’s movies. In Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, Frodo Baggins acquired the One Ring at Bilbo’s party in the year 3001 of the Third Age and left Bag End in 3018. In The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, this timeframe appeared significantly compressed.
Frodo began his quest 17 years after becoming a Ringbearer, a time period which The Lord of the Rings took delight in describing. This part of the novel set up the Shire and Frodo’s relationship with Gandalf and his Hobbit friends. The Fellowship of the Ring cuts this detail. Unfortunately, 17 years of Hobbit life probably had no place in Jackson’s three-hour movie.
14 The Fellowship Of The Ring Didn’t Show Barrow-wights
Jackson Cut Tolkien’s Terrifying Barrow-wights
In the “Fog on the Barrow-downs” chapter of The Fellowship of the Ring, the Hobbits face Tolkien’s frightening Barrow-wights, which the movie cut. Frodo’s mission really started taking the shape of a high fantasy epic here, drawing in frightening monsters that Frodo and company only just escaped. This would have been incredible to see on the big screen.
Jackson’s decision to cut the Barrow-wights partially made sense in the grander scheme of his Fellowship of the Ring movie. Although including one detail of this subplot would have made The Return of the King make a lot more sense. Merry’s blade, which compromised the Witch-king, was only capable of such magic as an ancient blade recovered from the Barrow-downs after Merry’s narrow escape. This information would have provided useful context for the Witch-king’s defeat.
13 Tom Bombadil was Cut From The Fellowship Of The Ring
One Of Tolkien’s Best Characters Didn’t Make The Movie
Close
Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies excluded Tom Bombadil because he didn’t advance the plot. The first movie in The Lord of the Rings trilogy had a lot of ground to cover, so there was no space in its runtime for thematic elements that were superfluous to the overarching narrative. Peter Jackson explained this choice in the DVD Appendices to The Fellowship of the Ring:
What does Old Man Willow contribute to the story of Frodo carrying the Ring? What does Tom Bombadil ultimately really have to do with the Ring? I know there’s Ring stuff in the Bombadil episode, but it’s not really advancing our story.
Tom Bombadil was significant in The Lord of the Rings, carrying symbolism around nature and pacifism, providing levity, and presenting a unique plot device in Tolkien’s wider mythopoeia. Bombadil was a mystery Tolkien inserted to help develop a convincing set of fictional myths. For this reason, perhaps Bombadil’s exclusion from the movies wasn’t such a bad thing after all, leaving him safely shrouded in mystery.
Related Lord Of The Rings Cutting Tom Bombadil Was Right (& Tolkien May Agree)
Omitting Tom Bombadil from Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring was controversial, but even J.R.R Tolkien may have agreed with the decision.
12 Arwen Drove Off The Ringwraiths In The Movie
Glorfindel Withstood The Nazgûl In The Book
Close
One huge change Peter Jackson made from the book to the movie was swapping Glorfindel for Arwen at the Ford of Bruinen as the one to rescue Frodo from the evil Nazgûl. In the book, the heroic Elf Glorfindel rescued Frodo. However, Jackson gave Arwen a bigger role to help the audience warm to her character as Aragorn’s love interest.
Glorfindel was a highlight of the books but was only one of many incredible characters in The Lord of the Rings. The problem with adapting a huge range of characters is that it wouldn’t allow the on-screen adaptation to be character-driven, as it wouldn’t allow enough time to be spent on each character. Character development is normally quite key in Hollywood blockbusters, and it’s true that Arwen could have easily fallen flat with less screen time.
11 Erkenbrand Had A Role In The Book But Not The Movie
The Rohirrim Commander Was A Big Presence In the Book
Close
Rohirrim leader Erkenbrand’s place in the War of the Ring was huge in The Lord of the Rings but was cut completely from Jackson’s movies, mostly replaced by Karl Urban’s Éomer. The Lord of the Rings was a war story, among other things, reflecting Tolkien’s own experience at war. So, his books fleshed out the war of the movie and its battles in far greater detail, with lots more nuance.
The upcoming anime movie
The Lord of the Rings: War of the Rohirrim
will be released on December 13, 2024.
Perhaps cutting Erkenbrand worked for Jackson’s movies for the same reason that cutting Glorfindel did, but Jackson’s movies could have taken a more Tolkienian approach to war. Jackson’s funny action movies were a hit, which is a good thing, but they occasionally felt like they trivialized war compared to Tolkien’s book. This may have been avoidable with more detail around its strategy, losses, and heroes like Erkenbrand.
10 Jackson’s Movies Let Down The Prince Of Dol Amroth
Prince Imrahil Didn’t Feature In Peter Jackson’s Movies
Close
Prince Imrahil of Dol Amroth was yet another character from the source material that was not featured in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, or The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Imrahil seemed important to the book, siding with Aragorn during his ascendancy to the throne, helping to legitimize his claim. He was also Faramir and Boromir’s uncle and was even more closely related to the Elves than Aragorn, as another Dúnadan.
In The Lord of the Rings, “Legolas looked at him and bowed low; for he saw that here indeed was one who had elven-blood in his veins,” proving the potential for a heroic Númenórean supporting character. However, introducing characters this late in action or adventure movie franchises wasn’t standard practice. It could confuse an audience and detract from its time spent forming emotional connections with existing characters in the lead-up to the finale.
9 Saruman’s Fate Was A Mystery In The Two Towers
Saruman Diminished Even Further In the Book
Close
The theatrical editions of all three Lord of the Rings movies ignored Saruman’s fate, but Saruman’s character kept developing long after Aragorn’s coronation in the book. Saruman died grotesquely in the extended version of The Return of the King after serious backlash from fans and Saruman actor Christopher Lee about cutting Saruman’s death from The Two Towers.
In both the book and movie, Saruman’s arc ended with him being betrayed and stabbed by Wormtongue. In the book, Saruman shriveled up, showing how far he had fallen. However, in the extended edition of The Return of the King, Saruman fell from Orthanc and died impaled on a sharp spike on a wheel. Saruman was a Maia, and in the book, his spirit fled the scene. But there is no such spirit seen rising from Saruman’s corpse in the movie.
Related Saruman’s Final Form? Jackson’s Lord Of The Rings Movies Cut The Villain’s Best Transformation
Gandalf’s transformation into Gandalf the White is one that Lord of the Rings fans know well, but the movies missed Saruman’s own costume change.
8 Éowyn’s Romance Was Shown In An Extended Version
Faramir And Éowyn Offered A Dark Story Some Redemption
Close
Faramir and Éowyn were both huge characters in the book, but it is perhaps only Éowyn’s side of this duo that shone through in Jackson’s movies. Éowyn may be The Lord of the Rings’ most prominent female character, so it made sense for Jackson to focus on her in his trilogy. Faramir and Éowyn both endured lifelong struggle, despite being nobility of their realms, so for Tolkien to end their arcs in a romance was one of the brightest points of redemption and hope in a dark narrative.
Frodo’s story was one of PTSD, and his arc ended with him sailing to Valinor. This offered a fantastical solution to his problems but could be seen as a sad indication of the real-world difficulty of overcoming his struggle. There are no Valinors for real-life war veterans. Faramir and Éowyn’s story was a relief in such a sad tale. Jackson’s movies were more light-hearted than the novel in some ways, so this relief wasn’t as needed as it was in the book. However, this still felt like an important piece of the puzzle. Jackson did show Faramir and Éowyn in the Houses of Healing in Return of the King’s extended edition.
7 Gimli Was Used For Comic Relief In the Movies
Gimli Was A Serious Figure In The Book
Close
Gimli, in Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, presented a serious departure from Tolkien’s novel, often being used for comic relief. The Gimli of Tolkien’s story was a far more serious figure and portrayed as perhaps the sturdiest member of all the Fellowship, excepting maybe Gandalf. Gimli was a popular member of the Fellowship in the movies, but if an adaptation ever retrod this ground, it would be good to see the awe-inspiring hero of the book emerge.
Gimli and Legolas were both older than Aragorn in the book. While Aragorn was rightfully portrayed as the Fellowship’s leader in the movie, Gimli’s seniority could have come through a little more. Gimli’s arc in the books extended into The Lord of the Rings’ appendices. While it’s true that no movie trilogy could ever hope to adapt all of those, perhaps some of Gimli’s achievements could have informed the movies more – Gimli became Lord of the Glittering Caves in the book, helping rebuild the gates of Minas Tirith.
6 Gimli And Legolas Went On Further Travels In The Book
Legolas And Gimli’s Friendship Changed Middle-earth
Close
Perhaps the main importance of Gimli and Legolas was their Middle-earth-shattering friendship which overcame centuries of prejudice between Elves and Dwarves. Jackson’s movies did show Gimli and Legolas’ blossoming friendship, which was a highlight. But the movies didn’t show the idyllic aftermath of the War of the Ring, whereby Gimli and Legolas got to continue their friendship.
In Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, Gimli and Legolas promised each other to travel together if they survived the War of the Ring. They survived, of course, and visited Gimli’s choice of destination – the Glittering Caves – followed by Legolas’ choice of destination – Fangorn Forest. Perhaps the best illustration of their friendship breaking all the rules was Legolas bringing Gimli with him to the undying lands at the end of the story, which the movies cut.
5 Sauron Was A Huge Eye In The Lord Of The Rings Movies
Tolkien Didn’t Describe Sauron As A Giant Eye On Barad-dûr
Close
Peter Jackon’s divisive portrayal of Sauron as a giant eye suspended between the two apex points of Barad-dûr was an invention of the movies, with Tolkien’s Eye of Sauron a far more ambiguous concept. Tolkien described “Sauron’s Eye” as a terrible form of surveillance in Middle-earth. However, this description was functioning metaphorically, and any literal presence that the Eye did have was never described.
One part of The Silmarillion went so far as to say that “the Eye of Sauron the Terrible few could endure,” as the latest form Sauron had created for himself was “an image of malice and hatred made visible.” The eye in this description is just as metaphorical as its other uses in the book, but it also paints Sauron’s terrifying face with open-ended mystery. This was open to interpretation, and Jackson took the liberty of interpreting it in his movies,
4 Faramir Was A Far Bigger Hero In The Book
The Movies Sold Faramir Short
Close
From The Fellowship of the Ring to The Return of the King, Hollywood never provided the right representation of fantasy legend Faramir. Faramir was easily one of the best 10 characters of The Lord of the Rings, but even more likely one of the best five. However, from watching the movies, this wasn’t apparent.
Faramir’s purity and nobility stood out like a sore thumb in Tolkien’s book, even among a Fellowship of outrageously heroic types. Faramir was far more worthy of the Fellowship than Boromir, but Boromir was needed as a foil for Aragorn and a plot device in the Fellowship, plus his character development showed that heroism comes in many forms. Faramir resisted the Ring’s temptation far more in the book and also treated Frodo and Gollum far better.
3 The Two Towers Sacrificed Théoden’s Heroics To Aragorn
Théoden Was One Of The Book’s Biggest Heroes
Close
Théoden and Éowyn were two of the book’s best characters, but only Éowyn got the screen time she deserved in the movies. Rohan represented humanity the most out of all the kingdoms or characters of Middle-earth, despite the roles of Aragorn, Boromir, and all of Gondor. That’s because Gondor had Elvish influence, while Tolkien based Rohan on the Anglo-Saxons, and their culture told a story of early English people. Rohan’s importance makes it obvious and imperative that it would offer up some of the novel’s best characters.
In The Lord of the Rings, Théoden proposed the suicide mission in the Battle of Hornburg that was attributed to Aragorn in the movies by Peter Jackson. This glorious moment in The Two Towers told audiences all they needed to know about Aragorn, and it was a smart choice for a movie trying to reduce days worth of subject matter into hours and still land on content with its main characters hitting the right notes. However, Théoden’s supporting role in the movie was reduced to antihero or deeply flawed hero at best. The novel also says a lot more about Merry’s adoration of Théoden than the movies.
Related 2024’s Lord Of The Rings Movie Will Change How You See This Tolkien Character
The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim will make a major change to the franchise, doing justice to a character from the original trilogy.
2 Aragorn Didn’t Kill The Mouth Of Sauron In The Book
Killing The Mouth Of Sauron Was Out Of Character
Aragorn negotiated with the Mouth of Sauron in both the book and the movie version of The Lord of the Rings, but only in Jackson’s extended edition of The Return of the King did Aragorn kill him. Jackson was right to cut this unfaithful scene from the movie’s theatrical edition. However, the movies’ extended editions really represent, for the most part, the superior versions of the movies, so it’s hard not to see this scene as a part of the ultimate Return of the King.
Tolkien’s profound meditation on war and mortality that was Lord of the Rings seriously considered many sides of war, including reasons to fight and reasons not to. Tolkien glorified peace over fighting wherever it was possible, but saluted the need to fight back against tyranny. Aragorn’s decision to behead the Mouth of Sauron vastly oversimplified the story’s attitude to war, reducing a war story to an action flick and reducing Aragorn to a thug. Granted, Lord of the Rings was more than just a war story, but this uncharacteristic act certainly seemed to contradict the spirit of the novel.
1 The Return Of The King Cut The Scouring Of The Shire
This Challenging But Vital End To The Story Was Missing From The Movie
Close
In a major change, Peter Jackson’s movies excluded the Scouring of the Shire. While The Lord of the Rings movies culminated in the War of the Ring, with the denouement the defeat of Sauron, Tolkien’s book tied off each character’s arc more thoroughly than the movies. For the Hobbits, this included a journey home whereby the relief of war’s end was tangible. However, unfortunately, things weren’t so simple. Saruman was at work in the Shire, taking control, subjugating locals, and ruining the countryside with industrialization toward his own ends.
Jackson’s movies were fantasy, horror, and comedy all at once, and in this sense, they did a great job. It’s a shame that the pacing of the movies challenged the inclusion of this thematically essential bookend for the story. However, Sauron’s fall may have been a suitable end for a trilogy needing a dramatic climax to leave the viewer with the right impression. Jackson did, at least, reference the Scouring of the Shire in the Mirror of Galadriel scene in The Lord of the Rings.
The Lord of the Rings
The Lord of the Rings is a multimedia franchise consisting of several movies and a TV show released by Amazon titled The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power. The franchise is based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s book series that began in 1954 with The Fellowship of the Ring. The Lord of the Rings saw mainstream popularity with Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit trilogies.
Movie(s) The Lord of the Rings (1978) , The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring , The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers , The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King , The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey , The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug , The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies , The Lord of The Rings: The War of The Rohirrim Created by J.R.R. Tolkien First Film The Lord of the Rings (1978) Cast Norman Bird , Anthony Daniels , Elijah Wood , Ian McKellen , Liv Tyler , Viggo Mortensen , Sean Astin , Cate Blanchett , John Rhys-Davies , Billy Boyd , Dominic Monaghan , Orlando Bloom , Christopher Lee , Hugo Weaving , Sean Bean , Ian Holm , Andy Serkis , Brad Dourif , Karl Urban , Martin Freeman , Richard Armitage , James Nesbitt , Ken Stott , Benedict Cumberbatch , Evangeline Lilly , Lee Pace , Luke Evans , Morfydd Clark , Mike Wood , Ismael Cruz Cordova , Charlie Vickers , Markella Kavenagh , Megan Richards , Sara Zwangobani , Daniel Weyman , Cynthia Addai-Robinson , Lenny Henry , Brian Cox , Shaun Dooley , Miranda Otto , Bilal Hasna , Benjamin Wainwright , Luke Pasqualino , Christopher Guard , William Squire , Michael Scholes , John Hurt TV Show(s) The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Character(s) Frodo Baggins , Gandalf , Legolas , Boromir , Sauron , Gollum , Samwise Gamgee , Pippin Took , Celeborn , Aragorn , Galadriel , Bilbo Baggins , Saruman , Aldor , Wormtongue , Thorin Oakenshield , Balin Dwalin , Bifur , Bofur , Bombur , Fili , Kili , Oin , Gloin , Nori , Dori , Ori , Tauriel , King Thranduil , Smaug , Radagast , Arondir , Nori Brandyfoot , Poppy Proudfellow , Marigold Brandyfoot , Queen Regent Míriel , Sadoc Burrows Video Game(s) The Lord of the Rings Online , Middle-Earth: Shadow of War , The Lord Of The Rings: Gollum , The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria Expand