AFN addresses controversy over Favour Ofili’s exclusion from Olympics

The Athletics Federation of Nigeria (AFN) has issued a statement addressing the outcry over the disqualification of sprinter Favour Ofili from the women’s 100m event at the 2024 Paris Olympics amid complaints about administrative oversight and allegations of chaotic behaviour by Ofili.

Favour Ofili, a beacon of hope for Nigerian athletics with her impressive run to the Olympics, was noticeably absent from the 100m start list, sparking widespread criticism and public outcry. The AFN, in an attempt to clarify the situation, not only confirmed Ofili’s entry into the event but also addressed what they described as “rude behavior“ .

In posts circulating on X (formerly Twitter), AFN officials have suggested that Ofili’s behavior could affect other athletes, hinting at a broader problem with the federation’s management of athletes. “No one in AFN said that. Ofili should change her nationality to another country, but if she desperately wants to go, no one can stop her.” The statement was interpreted by many on social media as an admission of failure to manage the relationship with the athlete rather than addressing the core issue of her not participating in the event.

The controversy deepened when it was revealed that Ofili had signed up for the 100m, 200m and 4x100m relay, but her name was mysteriously absent from the 100m list. This led to speculation and accusations of deliberate sabotage or incompetence. The AFN’s response was to partially blame Ofili’s behaviour, demonstrating a pattern of behaviour they found challenging.

Public sentiment, as reflected on X, was largely supportive of Ofili. Many users expressed frustration with what they saw as AFN mismanagement. Comments ranged from calls for AFN officials to resign to advocating for Ofili to potentially represent another country where her talents could be better appreciated and managed.

See also  Why was Usher sent to live with him at 15 years old

Nigeria’s Sports Minister, John Enoh, has promised a thorough investigation and that those responsible for the oversight will face sanctions. However, no concrete action has been reported, further fueling public discontent.

This incident marred Ofili’s Olympics and affected the AFN’s reputation in managing athletes’ careers, especially in the international arena.

Leave a Comment